Authorship (RCR-Basic) This module provides an overview of the ethical responsibilities of authors. Researchers must check with an IRB before proceeding with a protocol involving human participants, in order to ensure that those participants are adequately protected. Reflection on responsible conduct of research should recur throughout a scientist’s career: at the undergraduate, post-baccalaureate, predoctoral, postdoctoral, and faculty levels. I've already talked to one of the new students about working on those projects this fall." Our research project was a joint enterprise, and all the work you did was funded by money I brought in via grants. We thoroughly check each answer to a question to provide you with the most correct answers. Click to rate this post! An IRB is responsible for reviewing the scientific, legal, and ethical merits of a human subjects research protocol before the research starts and while the research is ongoing. There are precautions researchers can take – in the planning, implementation and follow-up of studies – to protect these participants in research. Found a mistake? Clinical research advances the understanding of science and promotes human health. However, it is important to remember the individuals who volunteer to participate in research. The data do not belong to you or to me; they actually belong to the university, and the work will be continued with other students. Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR), and provides an overview of the subject matter covered in CITI Program’s RCR courses. (iv) The principles and practices for encouraging the responsible conduct of research, for institutions and researchers (v) A framework for resolving allegations of breaches of this Code and research misconduct, for institutions and researchers. [Total: 1 Average: 5] Contents hide 1 About these courses 2 Terms and answers to learn … CITI Training Responsible Conduct (RCR) Quiz Answers Read More » Responsible Conduct Regarding Scientific Communication — Society for Neuroscience; The Responsible Conduct of Research, Including Responsible Authorship and Publication Practices (PDF, 112KB) — Ruth Ellen Bulger) Comments on Bulger (above) (PDF, 97KB) — Henk van den Belt; Publication ethics: rights and wrongs — (Ritter, S. K., 2001) Boards monitor the nature of the informed consent given to the research subjects as well as the issue of whether confidentiality is maintained during the study and afterward. A board is responsible for determining whether the benefit of the research is sufficient to counterbalance any risks associated with the project.
Let us know about it through the REPORT button at the bottom of the page. Consequentialist (utalitarianism) focuses on consequences, greatest good to greater number .