So no: using a
does not define a section in HTML. Hardly any mention of the other element tags above.
Instead much emphasis on "div" as the container of choice is taught. But they have each different symantic. Don’t get me wrong, there is nothing wrong with using DIV tags and there will always be a use for them, some pieces of content should be marked up using tags with semantic meaning. Articles and sections. The first part goes through what table and div hells are, including lots of examples. Beachten Sie: Die Elemente article, section, nav und aside bilden jeweils ihren eigenen Inhaltsbereich. But that’s not the way the spec reads, so I guess I’ll just have to either get used to doing something that feels weird & wrong… Reply. Aren't we defining sections in both cases? Chances are you are living in the past or working on a project that was built in the past that is still marking up content using DIV tags instead of semantic tags like article and section. The next section shows how to write cleaner and more readable code. If it’s a descendant of body (possibly with header or some divs between) it’s primary navigation for the site. Just named different to make sense of what is happening on the page. It really championed the idea that how your document is structured and what tags you use should convey meaning to user agents. A section may consist of one or more phrases, just like a novelist text, gathered together subject by subject. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API. Original article by Jennifer Krynin. Articles are no more than the heading (or ‘caption’) of the sections immediately underneath. Please join us on this journey from hell to heaven. Some courses in treehouse use sections and some stick with divs for sections. r/vuejs: Vue.js is a library for building interactive web interfaces. 1) Placing the entire list in and then each preview in a , as the list is essentially one big article with lots of different sections. With the release of new HTML5 tags, such as article, section, header, footer, nav and figure, many web developers decided that these elements are meant to fully replace our old buddy div. So in effect section, article, aside and main are all divs. Deshalb stellen die meisten Browser Überschriften innerhalb dieser Elemente bereits als untergeordnete Überschriften dar. Empfehlung: Die Angabe des role-Attributs: ist nicht nötig, da dies der implizite Standardwert ist. William Whitworth 6,117 Points William Whitworth .
, on the other hand, does not convey any meaning, aside from any found in its class, lang and title attributes. relates to a single theme), and should appear as an entry in an outline of the page. What is the difference between <section> and <div> in HTML? Is there any reason for this? The sections contain the provisions relating to a particular topic. Section is semantic (and newer). How come TreeHouse HTML class did not touch on the subject of semantic tags like "article" "main", "section" and "aside" tags. This point of view is not quite right, and it's too early to retire the div tag. Edited by Jeremy Girard on 3/15/17 HTML5 was a major stepping stone for the concept of semantic code. 2 Answers. The difference is that a span can be inline by default, a div by default is a block object. HTML Elements ,
and are all block elements. means that the content inside is grouped (i.e. The final part looks at what features await in future. Siehe auch HTML/outline. The issue however was that div was used for about everything and this made reading html code not so easy. Div can be used similarly but doesn't have the implicit meaning (see Jennifer Nordell's explanation). This article covers common problems with layout structure in web design. Among others, the and elements were introduced as a way to section your content in a more meaningful way than a regular