This is shown in every action he commits which simply leads him closer to it, as hard as he/his parents, try to stray away from fulfilling the prophecy, they really only get closer to it.
The people of Thebes blame the pestilence destroying their city upon the gods; so, too, do they … Therefore, Oedipus may have deserved his fate, as he was too Ignorant to listen toJocasta and end his Investigation. When the shepherd arrives on the scene he is forced by Oedipus to verify that Oedipus is the child of Jocasta and King Laius. Finally, Oedipus did not deserve the fate he received at the end of the play because he all the actions he took, good or bad led to his eventual disastrous fate: therefore, Oedipus was helpless in changing his fate, and he was destined to have the same fate no matter what he did. Oedipus’ is now forced to realize that he has not escaped his fate. Oedipus’ fate throughout the play has been decided by the prophecy which contributes to his destruction.
The inciting incident right away turns up with the plague that now afflicts the citizens, whom King Oedipus calls the "new blood of ancient Cadmus." It is a strange twist of fate this messenger both took Oedipus to Corinth, but also is one of the final puzzle pieces in Oedipus’ true identity. The unaccounted factor is the reason for Oedipus’s actions. His parents had originally given him as a baby to the Herdsman to be killed, to keep the prophecy from becoming fulfilled. Oedipus the King The setting is Thebes around the fifth century. Cadmus was the founder of the mythological Thebes. The title of the play in Latin is Oedipus Rex which translated means Oedipus the King but the Greek title is Oedipus Tyrannos which means Oedipus the Tyrant.
Through constant pressuring by Oedipus, Tiresias reveals Oedipus was the one who killed Laius. The Herdsman said, “I was to kill …show more content… He did not want to kill his father and sleep with his mother. Oedipus’s lust for knowledge and thirst for admiration by his subjects spells his own demise. Answered Oct 18, 2018 Oedipus is a victim of fate. Oedipus does not deserve his fate. It is obvious that Sophocles regarded Oedipus as a tyrant, and one who deserved his fate.
This shows that he is not a victim of fate by uncovering events of past blindness. Oedipus chooses to blind himself rather than the past making it impossible for him to rule effectively (Zumi). Oedipus certainly deserved his fate.
Words: 1163 Length: 4 Pages Document Type: Essay Paper #: 11772089. This is seen when his parents first tried killing him to … It seems Oedipus brought upon his own fate through the pestering of Tiresias. Oedipus chooses to accept it his responsibility and live with dignity. Surely the negative team are not going to argue against the fact that Oedipus was a tragic figure Oedipus showed great disrespect for the Gods. This is evident as … Bad ones can uncover by good choices. If Oedipus was not responsible for his actions, and did not deserve his fate then he could not be viewed as a tragic figure since he would be a mere puppet of fate or of the gods.